Transcribed from the Devanagari OCR of the printed edition at shloka_source_url (Achyuta Nand Jha ed., vol. 1) and checked word-for-word against two further independent scans of two different printed editions of the same commentary — Krishna Chandra Dvivedi's (https://archive.org/download/brihatsamhitawithbhattotpalavivrittipartidr.krishnachandradvivedi/Brihat%20Samhita%20%20with%20Bhattotpala%20Vivritti%20Part%20I%20-%20Dr.%20Krishna%20Chandra%20Dvivedi_djvu.txt) and A.V. Tripathi's (https://archive.org/download/JiUm_brihat-samhita-part-1-of-varaha-mihira-by-avadh-bihari-tripathi-saraswati-bhavan-granthamala/Brihat%20Samhita%20Part%201%20of%20Varaha%20Mihira%20by%20Avadh%20Bihari%20Tripathi%20-%20Saraswati%20Bhavan%20Granthamala_djvu.txt). Only glyph-level OCR artifacts that all three scans show to be artifacts (e.g. OCR रद्वव for रद्गव, श्व for श्च) have been normalised; every substantive reading is as scanned, and the two places where the scans genuinely differ are flagged in identification_notes. The corresponding mūla is BS 11.34, GRETIL: 'saptamunīn saṃspṛśya dhruvam abhijitam eva ca pratinivṛttaḥ / nabhaso +ardhamātram itvā yāmyena^astam samupayāti' (https://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/corpustei/transformations/plaintext/sa_varAhamihira-bRhatsaMhitA.txt).
'The asterism of Brahmā' = ABHIJIT. Identification is secure by direct textual substitution: Varāhamihira's mūla at BS 11.34 says the Cala-ketu comet touches 'sapta-munīn, dhruvam, abhijitam eva ca'; the Parāśara passage Utpala quotes on the same verses says it approaches 'brahma-nakṣatram', then grazes 'dhruvaṃ brahmarāśiṃ saptarṣīn'. Brahma-nakṣatra therefore stands exactly where Varāhamihira has Abhijit. Utpala confirms the equation independently in his gloss on the nakṣatra-deity list at BS 97.5: 'brahmā abhijitaḥ' — Brahmā is Abhijit's regent. Abhijit = Vega is fixed elsewhere in the database. Bears on the database's unidentified 'Brāhmaṇa' nakṣatra of Maitrāyaṇī Saṃhitā 2.13.20: that one has SOMA as its deity, not Brahmā, so the two are probably NOT the same name and Brahma-nakṣatra does not resolve it.